Nietzscheanism FAQ
From here you can go up to the main page about Nietzscheanism.
What is the connection between Nietzsche and Nietzscheanism?
This stemmed from Nietzsche's conception of "ubermenschen" -
supermen.
Humanity, to Nietzsche, was a transition phase between
animal and superman - much like homo-erectus was a
transition phase between an ape and a human.
Nietzsche's idea of "downgoing" - which refers to the
process of "becoming the superman".
Nietzsche considered the aim desirable - and wanted to get
the process over with as rapidly as possible.
While Nietzsche rejected many of Darwin's ideas his ideas
were a close enough fit for the creators of Andromeda to
make the connection - and the species of
The Nietzscheans was born.
A distinguishing characteristic of the Nietzscheans
is their devotion to the propagation of their own genes -
and it seems to be one of the few attempts to present the
idea in art - thus the naming here.
Is Nietzscheanism a religion?
Nietzscheanism offers directives about how to live.
Other religions also do that - Buddhism, Hinduism,
Taoism, Christianity, Sufism, etc.
So - there is definitely some overlap.
To continue the comparison, Nietzscheanism suggests life is
potentially immortal - but also that it can die.
It suggests that there is reincarnation - and that it takes
place whenever offspring are born.
It claims that ancestral wisdom is available to individuals
- via their genes - and suggests that some traditional
religous practices are intended to facilitate access to that
information.
Like Buddhism it suggests that lower creatures can turn into
higher ones. As with Buddhism, the process involves an
iterated series of reincarnations. The Nietzscheans would
refer to it as evolution.
Again - like Buddhism - it rejects the possibility that the
human personality survives death. What can survive
is an "essence" of self. This is also the part of you that
has survived from previous existences. The Buddhists called
it "Atman". The Nietzscheans refer to it as your genetic
heritage.
As with Buddhism - it suggests that it is possible to
"escape from the wheel of death and rebirth" - for example
by spending your life in meditation, staring at a wall.
However it differs from Buddism over whether this is
a desirable thing to do.
Nietzscheanism thus has a number of similarities with
conventional religions.
One of its advantages is that it mostly recommends that
organisms carry on doing what they were unconsciously doing
already.
Like most other religions, it offers the carrot of
everlasting life to practitioners my way of motivation.
On the other hand, Nietzscheanism makes no claim to be a
path to happiness. It may be that the environment is
similar enough to the one nature was expecting for the
things that lead to reproduction to also lead to
happiness. If so great. However if the path to
reproduction definitely involves misery and suffering, then
it suggests you follow it anyway. This is bound to deter
some of those with little faith.
Can consciousness really help individuals
propagate their genes?
Almost certainly yes.
In particular, a well-developed brain with a sophisticated
model of the world could help organisms that find themselves
in unusual environments avoid identify areas where their
genetic program has been structured on the basis of out-of-
date information - and deliberately correct for this problem.
Won't Nietzscheanism spell the end of love and happiness?
Part of nature's strategy for propagating genes in the past
has been to wire sexual activity into the brain's reward
centres - to encourage reproductive behaviour with a sort of
Pavlovian conditioning.
Parental care is promoted by maternal love - powerful
strong feelings between a mother and her offspring that encourage
parental investment of time and resources.
This sort of low-level behavioural programming is all very well -
but can come unstuck in artificial environments.
For example for most men today, the simples way to have sex
with lots of women is to hire them. This might well have
been a strategy with a big reproductive pay off in the past
- but modern contraceptive techniques mean that this is
likely to be a very poor strategy for propagating
ones genes in modern times.
It's because of this sort of problem that the genes are
likely to build the brain in such a way that it cooperates
fully with its architects, and accept their goals as their
own.
As to whether this will mean the end of love, happiness and
sexual ecstacy - I suggest probably not. Those things will
probably have their uses to nature for some time to come -
and if anything I expect she will expand on their themes -
with even more powerful, intense and rich feelings.
Does Nietzscheanism involve becoming a sperm donor?
Sperm banks represent a new niche - that many individuals
who are following the traditional instructions in their
genes may overlook.
As such it may represent an area where competition with
other males may be less intense than usual.
However, most children are not born using donated
sperm - so the niche is of limited size - and it probably
won't take many Nietzscheans to saturate it.
In general, the details of the strategy you follow are too
complex for this FAQ to begin to address - so this sort of
decision is up to you.
My genes seem to have conflicting interests - which ones
do I listen to?
Again, that's for you to decide.
What about creating new successful replicators?
One way replicators can spread is by forming new
successful replicators - and then hitching a ride with them,
through an association of some sort.
To the extent that it helps the original genes, this sort of
activity might be favoured - assuming it can be performed
inexpensively.
In general, though genes can be expected to be more
concerned about their own replication, than that of
other replicators.
Shouldn't humans aspire to become meme propagators?
We should expect humans to propagate whatever replicator was
responsible for their construction. Most humans have been
primarily built by genes - not memes.
The genes of humans that devote their resources to
propagating memes (at the expense of their genes) will
not be favoured by natural selection - and will tend to die out
- in much the same way that individuals afflicted by viruses
are also selected against.
If this happens a lot, then nature seems likely to respond
with better defenses against hostile memetic infections.
Of course - at the same time, the memes are evolving to
better take advantage of their human hosts.
What about helping your species reproduce?
Genes that favour species reproduction are likely
to be favoured in the same way that they are in the rest of
biology - i.e. very slowly - and without much in the way of
obvious detectable effect on the phenotype.
Species level selection probably plays some role in
biology - but the extent of its significance is not yet
clear.
Nietzscheans who promote their species at the expense of
themselves are probably not acting in their genes
best interests - according to most modern biologists.
Are there any Nietzscheans around today?
Yes - though their numbers are not known.
Won't Nietzscheanism lead to overpopulation starvation and population crashes?
That doesn't seem very likely in the short term.
As to the best way to deal with the tendency of individuals
to dramatically outpace their food supply under some
circumstances (thus causing boom and bust phenomena) -
that's a resource management problem - and is best dealt
with by the government - rather than by expecting individual
restraint - since expecting individual restraint is usually
unrealistic and ineffective.
Why are not most self-conscious creatures already Nietzscheans?
Some of them already are.
However self-consciousness is still in an embryonic
stage. Humanity has only just lifted its head out of its
biological puddle and started to look around - so to
speak.
As such it would be unrealistic to expect nature to have
got everything just right the first time.
Also, in the past, the environment expected by the genes has
been - broadly speaking - the same as the environment the
organism finds itself in.
The large brain was needed to deal with unpredictable
environmental stimuli - not radical changes in the
nature of the environment.
However, now the mismatch between genes an environment seems
likely to be substantial for some period - so there will
be more intense selection for a brain that can detect these
mismatches - and correct for them.
This is an era of consciousness expansion.
Expanding the consciousness of organisms to more fully
include their biological drives seems likely to lead
directly to organisms consciously propagating their genes -
since that's exactly what they were doing before
unconsciously.
Wasn't Nietzsche the author of "Der Antichrist" - who
inspired Hitler?
Both Nietzsche and Darwin are both credited by their
opponents as influencing Hitler's thinking.
There seems to be some truth to this - but that's no more
reason for rejecting Nietzscheanism than is is for rejecting
Darwinism.
What is the relationship between Nietzscheanism and
Transhumanism?
Nietzscheans are Transhumanists.
Not all Transhumanists are necessarily Nietzscheans, though.
However, they often seem to share their interests in
technologies such as self-improvement, genetic engineering
and nanotechnology.
Can I become a Nietzschean?
Sure. Nietzscheanism is an intentional stance - so you can
become one today.
However becoming effective as a Nietzschean
typically takes a lot of hard work.
|